<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Web SPAM &#8211; Should We All Snitch For Google?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bliznet.com/web-spam-snitch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bliznet.com/web-spam-snitch/</link>
	<description>Internet marketing and web design experience.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 19:10:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Nagle</title>
		<link>http://www.bliznet.com/web-spam-snitch/comment-page-1/#comment-5961</link>
		<dc:creator>John Nagle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 18:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bliznet.com/?p=560#comment-5961</guid>
		<description>Search spam is essential to Google&#039;s business model.  If organic search takes you directly to the site that&#039;s selling what you want, Google makes no money.  But a trip through a few AdWords-heavy spam sites brings in revenue.  This fundamentally conflicts with &quot;don&#039;t be evil&quot;.  

It&#039;s quite feasible to put a huge dent in search spam.  What&#039;s needed is to find the business behind the web site, do some automated due diligence on them, and apply some basic standards, like having a business address, business license, corporate identity or d/b/a name, BBBonline rating, etc. We do that at SiteTruth.com, as a technology demo. This down-rates out what we call &quot;bottom feeders&quot;.  SiteTruth was developed as an experiment to see what the web looks like if you take a hard line on web spam.  It seems to help.  

This has to be automated; trying to use manual reports will at best catch the most blatant spammers.  We&#039;ve learned that from email spam control. 

None of the major search engines do anything tough in this area.  They should. There&#039;s some of that in the B2B directories like ThomasNet. There, though, the site operator has to formally sign up to be listed, and may have to pay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Search spam is essential to Google&#8217;s business model.  If organic search takes you directly to the site that&#8217;s selling what you want, Google makes no money.  But a trip through a few AdWords-heavy spam sites brings in revenue.  This fundamentally conflicts with &#8220;don&#8217;t be evil&#8221;.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s quite feasible to put a huge dent in search spam.  What&#8217;s needed is to find the business behind the web site, do some automated due diligence on them, and apply some basic standards, like having a business address, business license, corporate identity or d/b/a name, BBBonline rating, etc. We do that at SiteTruth.com, as a technology demo. This down-rates out what we call &#8220;bottom feeders&#8221;.  SiteTruth was developed as an experiment to see what the web looks like if you take a hard line on web spam.  It seems to help.  </p>
<p>This has to be automated; trying to use manual reports will at best catch the most blatant spammers.  We&#8217;ve learned that from email spam control. </p>
<p>None of the major search engines do anything tough in this area.  They should. There&#8217;s some of that in the B2B directories like ThomasNet. There, though, the site operator has to formally sign up to be listed, and may have to pay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.bliznet.com/web-spam-snitch/comment-page-1/#comment-5951</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 13:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bliznet.com/?p=560#comment-5951</guid>
		<description>&quot;Any SEO worth their mettle has probably, at some point, done something that Google would frown upon&quot;

Okay, but this is just an example of why you should not use &quot;Any SEO&quot; if you want long term success.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Any SEO worth their mettle has probably, at some point, done something that Google would frown upon&#8221;</p>
<p>Okay, but this is just an example of why you should not use &#8220;Any SEO&#8221; if you want long term success.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alysson</title>
		<link>http://www.bliznet.com/web-spam-snitch/comment-page-1/#comment-5864</link>
		<dc:creator>Alysson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 01:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bliznet.com/?p=560#comment-5864</guid>
		<description>Google is not your friend.  By asking us to submit SPAM reports, Google is asking us to help them do a better job...for free.  No thanks.  They make the big bucks.  They like to pretend they&#039;re smarter than everyone else.  Let them earn their paychecks and their moniker as the self-appointed Internet Police.  Any SEO worth their mettle has probably, at some point, done something that Google would frown upon.  Karma is a bitch.  And I want her on my side.

Spraining an ankle running to tattle on someone to Google doesn&#039;t help anyone but Google.  It&#039;s also the quickest way to introduce yourself to Google as a part of the search marketing industry.  You do not want to be on that radar.  Seriously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google is not your friend.  By asking us to submit SPAM reports, Google is asking us to help them do a better job&#8230;for free.  No thanks.  They make the big bucks.  They like to pretend they&#8217;re smarter than everyone else.  Let them earn their paychecks and their moniker as the self-appointed Internet Police.  Any SEO worth their mettle has probably, at some point, done something that Google would frown upon.  Karma is a bitch.  And I want her on my side.</p>
<p>Spraining an ankle running to tattle on someone to Google doesn&#8217;t help anyone but Google.  It&#8217;s also the quickest way to introduce yourself to Google as a part of the search marketing industry.  You do not want to be on that radar.  Seriously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

