<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SEO and Validation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bliznet.com/seo-and-validation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bliznet.com/seo-and-validation/</link>
	<description>Internet marketing and web design experience.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 19:10:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Blizzard</title>
		<link>http://www.bliznet.com/seo-and-validation/comment-page-1/#comment-2358</link>
		<dc:creator>David Blizzard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 05:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bliznet.com/?p=218#comment-2358</guid>
		<description>This is interesting and makes valid code an easy sell:
http://www.codeproject.com/KB/server-management/Google_Indexing_Problem.aspx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is interesting and makes valid code an easy sell:<br />
<a href="http://www.codeproject.com/KB/server-management/Google_Indexing_Problem.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.codeproject.com/KB/server-management/Google_Indexing_Problem.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Blizzard</title>
		<link>http://www.bliznet.com/seo-and-validation/comment-page-1/#comment-906</link>
		<dc:creator>David Blizzard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 01:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bliznet.com/?p=218#comment-906</guid>
		<description>Hi Tim, I have a theory (big surprise!). The bureaucracy of the big companies lends itself to poor code, bad choices and invalid site design. They generally use in-house designers and candidates can easily BS their way into those design jobs and they are either too lazy, unskilled, or headed up the ladder too fast to care. Those same people are the ones that would need to let the big shots know that validation even exists. If they spill the beans then they have to work harder, study longer, or they get stuck doing the &quot;grunt&quot; work because everyone else is pretending they don&#039;t know how. It&#039;s a lack of pride in their work. It&#039;s an attitude, as long as it renders and ranks properly why bother, nobody will know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tim, I have a theory (big surprise!). The bureaucracy of the big companies lends itself to poor code, bad choices and invalid site design. They generally use in-house designers and candidates can easily BS their way into those design jobs and they are either too lazy, unskilled, or headed up the ladder too fast to care. Those same people are the ones that would need to let the big shots know that validation even exists. If they spill the beans then they have to work harder, study longer, or they get stuck doing the &#8220;grunt&#8221; work because everyone else is pretending they don&#8217;t know how. It&#8217;s a lack of pride in their work. It&#8217;s an attitude, as long as it renders and ranks properly why bother, nobody will know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.bliznet.com/seo-and-validation/comment-page-1/#comment-905</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 23:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bliznet.com/?p=218#comment-905</guid>
		<description>Hi David,

I agree with what your saying and validation is a service worth paying for however as you say clients should know it has little to do with SEO. I have nothing against designers, nothing at all and work with a couple of exceptional guys. I understand the reasons to validate and how it can hamper the spiders, however when I see sites like tesco, BBC and the times not validating I wonder what it is that stops them from putting their hands in their pockets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi David,</p>
<p>I agree with what your saying and validation is a service worth paying for however as you say clients should know it has little to do with SEO. I have nothing against designers, nothing at all and work with a couple of exceptional guys. I understand the reasons to validate and how it can hamper the spiders, however when I see sites like tesco, BBC and the times not validating I wonder what it is that stops them from putting their hands in their pockets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

