Archive for the ‘Web Design’ Category

More Random Web Design Tips

Friday, June 5th, 2009

Body Element Classes

One thing I’ve started doing somewhat recently is adding a unique class name to the body element of each page. This allows me to write page-specific CSS as necessary without creating an extra stylesheet. Ideally, there should be styles for common elements that make up the site, rather than style for each page, but this can’t always be avoided. One case could be that a particular page needs to have a slightly different layout than the rest of the site. Body element class to the rescue!

Internet Explorer 6

We all know Internet Explorer 6 is a regular pain in the neck, right? Fortunately, it’s easy to add IE6-specific style with this selector:  * html [additional selectors...]

For example, the style * html p { font-weight: bold; } makes all paragraphs bold only in Internet Explorer 6.  It’s valid, but no other major browser will apply it. This is useful because sometimes the style needed to make things in IE6 look one way is drastically different than what is needed to make it look the same in all the other browsers. A simpler solution, though, is to tell your client to upgrade his 8-year-old browser. :)

“Navbars”

A site typically has a “bar” of navigational links. Vertically laid out navigation is easy to create and append additional links later. Horizontal navigation is sometimes desired instead, but it’s not always as trivial to append and can be a little trickier to achieve.

This tip will be focused on horizontal navigation. First, you should most definitely use unordered lists (the ul element) to organize your navigation links whether you’re using vertical, horizontal, upside-down, or anything-else-you-can-think of navigation. (See the W3’s excellent webmaster tips for more on unordered lists and their uses.) Once you’ve marked up your navigational links, jump over to the stylesheet and add a display: inline; line to your navigation’s li elements. Now take a step back and behold your now-horizontal navigational links!

If you find you need to set the width and height of your links, just set the display type of the a elements to inline-block, which I was surprised to find out was actually supported in Internet Explorer 6! Once you’ve set that, your links will behave like block-level elements as far as styling goes, but they will remain positioned inline. Sweet!

Well, that’s all for now. Make sure to check back occasionally for more random web tips from your Uncle Kyle!

—KB

Tags: , , , , ,
Posted in Web Design, Web Standards | No Comments »

Web Standards Again

Thursday, April 9th, 2009

Greetings! Many times we have clients that have trouble understanding the role of web standards and why they are important. So I created this high level explanation that I hope will suffice. It is, by its very nature, simplified and incomplete, so don’t stone me to death. Here goes…

The World Wide Web Consortium (www.w3.org) is the standards body for the internet. They define the standard “language” or markup that web pages are written in. All of our documents are written in the strict flavor of XHTML (eXtensible Hypertext Markup Language) 1.0 which is very intolerant of errors. Conforming to these standards has several practical benefits. First, the site is easier to update since all of the content is easy to read and logically organized. This reduces cost for updates to the site. The W3 provides a validator to check pages against the XHTML standard and report any errors that it finds.

Secondly, strict XHTML mandates that the graphical presentation of the page (how it looks) be separated from the actual content of the page. So there is a separate file we create called a “stylesheet” that determines how the page will look. All of the graphics, colors, and layout are determined by this stylesheet. This is a benefit because it makes for smaller, faster loading pages which can rank higher in search engines than bloated pages that are slow to load. It also makes it easier to update how the site looks. For example, as autumn approaches you could change the entire look of the site by changing the colors in the stylesheet to fall colors. This is much more efficient than redesigning a site in the old days when each individual page had to be changed at great expense.

Lastly, search engines look for unique, relevant content that is organized well. By keeping all of the content in a separate file, the content can be organized so that the most important information is close to the top of the document while repetitive elements such as the navigation links are closer to the footer. The major search engines find standards-compliant XHTML documents easier to index and typically they rank much higher than pages that have many errors.

There is a great FAQ on web standards and their importance at:

http://www.webstandards.org/learn/faq/

Good Luck!

—AV

Tags: , , , ,
Posted in SEO, Web Design, Web Standards | 1 Comment »

The img Element Vs. the CSS background-image Property

Friday, February 13th, 2009

Don’t know when to use the img element or when to use the CSS background-image property? Don’t fret; there is hope. Read further and all shall be revealed.

The img element is best used for pictures that are completely unrelated to the stylesheet. That is, pictures that would need to display no matter how much the look of the site changes. These would be pictures related to a news article or photos in a gallery.

The CSS background-image property is for images that make up the appearance of the stylesheet. These pictures on one stylesheet would be different or just completely absent on another stylesheet. They don’t add to the content of the page in any way and are only there to give the page its “look”. These image files would be stored in the stylesheet’s images folder. (See my last post for more on this.)

Just another tip from your uncle Kyle!

—KB

Tags: , , ,
Posted in Web Design, Web Standards | No Comments »

Organizing Your CSS Files

Friday, February 13th, 2009

When I create a web site, I like to organize my stylesheets and images into a specific folder structure. It keeps things tidy and separates presentation files (stylesheets and images) from content files (pages and images related to the content). It also leaves room for additional stylesheet “themes” for your site.

Here is an example of this folder structure:

/styles/
/styles/default/
/styles/default/images/

Default in this example would be the name of the “theme”. The sites I develop typically do not have multiple themes for the user to pick, so I don’t usually take the time to give them fancy names. However, if your site utilizes multiple stylesheets that the user could choose from (such as at the CSS Zen Garden), creative names would be helpful.

All stylesheets for the Default theme would be placed in the /styles/default/ folder. Likewise, images used by those stylesheets would go in the /styles/default/images/ folder.

This method keeps your styles consolidated and makes it easy to use them across multiple sites. All you need to do is copy the folder to the other site; you don’t need to pick through the images folder and figure out which ones are used by the stylesheet and which ones aren’t.

Technically, you wouldn’t even need to copy anything to another site. You could just specify the full URL in the link element or @import rule on the page, but I urge you not to do this. Your visitors may be using security software that sees cross-site references as malicious, thus blocking the stylesheet from downloading or, worse, blocking the entire page.

—KB

Tags: , , ,
Posted in Web Design | 1 Comment »

ASP.NET and XHTML Validation

Tuesday, January 13th, 2009

If you’ve ever created an XHTML 1.0 Strict page containing an ASP.NET form element and ran it through the W3 Validator, you’ve undoubtedly noticed it’s reported as being invalid no matter what you do and no matter how valid the code actually appears. This is because ASP.NET adjusts the way it renders markup according to the requesting user agent. ASP.NET pities the W3 Validator and sends it bad code. This can be fixed with a “browser” file. The file and instructions on its use are available from that page.

However, that’s not all. The validator will now see your pages the way you see them in your browser, but ASP.NET is still rendering an invalid name attribute on your form element! You need to add a line to the system.web section of your web.config file:

<xhtmlConformance mode="Strict" />

Now ASP.NET plays nice with the W3 Validator and renders a valid XHTML Strict form! Now you can stop using the XHTML Transitional doctype and start using the XHTML Strict doctype on your ASP.NET pages!

—KB

Tags: , , ,
Posted in Technology, Web Design, Web Standards | No Comments »

The Target Attribute and Strict XHTML

Tuesday, January 13th, 2009

So, you’ve decided to start creating your web sites with valid strict XHTML 1.0 and CSS. Your client wants a “links” page containing none other than links to other web sites. So you oblige and, to keep your client’s visitors on his site, you make the links open in a new window. So you throw in target="blank" and you’re done. Just run it through the W3 validator…

There is no attribute “target”? What gives?!

Yes, indeed, target is not a valid attribute in XHTML 1.0 Strict. There’s really only one way around it of which I’m aware, and that’s by using Javascript. My preferred method is as follows:

<a href="http://www.bliznet.com/" onclick="window.open(this.href, 'OffSite').focus(); return false;">

This opens the URL in a new window and brings it into focus if the user had previously opened an “OffSite” window and didn’t close it.

You would still put the desired URL in the href attribute just like with any hyperlink. That way, if the visitor for some reason has Javascript disabled, the link still functions correctly. It just wouldn’t open in a new window.

One caveat though—in Firefox 2 and later with default settings, this code causes the linked site to open in a new tab, not a new window. If you find this to be a problem, there is a way around it, and that’s by adding the window options parameter such as:

<a href="http://www.bliznet.com/" onclick="window.open(this.href, 'OffSite', 'directories=yes,location=yes,menubar=yes,resizable=yes,scrollbars=yes,toolbar=yes').focus(); return false;">

Those are all the options required to make the window appear normally with default tool and menu bars—kind of a pain. At this point, you may want to move the code into an external Javascript file. The function I use typically looks like the following:

function OpenOffSite(a)
{
window.open(a.href, "OffSite", "directories=yes,location=yes,menubar=yes,resizable=yes,scrollbars=yes,toolbar=yes").focus();
return false;
}

Then the onclick attribute of your anchor would look like so:

<a href="http://www.bliznet.com/" onclick="return OpenOffSite(this);">

Your links now open in a new window! Welcome to the world of XHTML conformity. :)

—KB

Tags: , , , , ,
Posted in Web Design, Web Standards | No Comments »

Writing Great Web Content

Monday, December 15th, 2008

Every web site owner wants more traffic and one of the methods that has been proven to be beneficial in obtaining higher organic search engine rankings is content optimization. In the world search engines, content is king! But what does it mean to have “good” content on your site? Does it mean that it has to have the breadth and depth of the Encyclopedia Britannica? Not at all. The old saying that sometimes less is more applies to creating content for the web. You  can have good content without rewriting War and Peace. One of the most important hallmarks of superior web content is focus. Noted editorial strategist Erin Kissane says, “Copy needs specific goals to accomplish.” Simply staying focused on a topic, while using correct punctuation, grammar, and spelling, can go a long way in increasing the quality of your copy and, consequently, your search engine rankings by feeding the the crawlers what they want: high quality content.

First, have a plan. Sit down, take a deep breath, and  figure out exactly who is your audience. What do you want them to know and then what do you want them to do? A typical web visitor is looking for something and your site may be one of many competing for their attention. Well organized content that is easy to read and think through will help Then, organize those thoughts  while asking yourself questions:

Do I have a main idea that is the focus of this single web page? Is that focus clear in the page’s description and title? Can I expand on this main idea and provide support for it? Does this thought belong with other like ideas in this page or is this idea so dissimilar that it belongs on another page?

So now look at what you have and pick out your topic sentences and calls to action. If these items were taken in isolation could you figure out exactly what the message was and what you should be compelled to do? If not, then keep at it until there is a clear relationship between your ideas and the knowledge you want the visitor to have and the action you want them to take.

A terrific resource for all web content authors is Janice Redish’s Letting Go of the Words: Writing Web Content that Works which can be found at Amazon.com.

Good luck!

—AV

Tags: , , ,
Posted in Internet Marketing, SEO, Web Design | No Comments »

Logical Structures and Happy Designers

Sunday, December 14th, 2008

While valid markup and CSS are necessary, they’re not the only things we web designers require to keep our sanity. One can create a valid page that is still difficult to work on. For example, using absolutely positioned elements for page layout is even worse than just using tables. When you add content to one element, the ones below it are not pushed down because they are no longer in the “flow” of the page. This causes overlap of content and makes it extremely difficult and frustrating to add anything to the page. Utilities such as Yahoo! SiteBuilder create pages like this.

A markup structure that is built to logically represent the content of the page and not to facilitate the appearance of the page is much more easily edited and future-proof than the “HTML soup” sites of old. I wistfully say “old”, but the truth of the matter seems to be that HTML soup is still the preferred meal of the majority of so-called web designers. A lot of the web sites we’ve moved to our servers are a pain to work with and rarely validate, and they were, sadly, created by professional web designers!

Another couple things that are bad practice but not invalid are the use of inline style and CSS classes with names that tie them to a particular stylesheet such as “red-text” or “left-side”. What if you change the stylesheet some day and that “red-text” is now supposed to be blue or the “left-side” spans the bottom of the page? The World Wide Web Consortium themselves discourage the naming of CSS classes like this. They also have some other useful tips that all web designers should read and keep in mind.

If you’re a fledgling web designer or perhaps someone who is just looking into having a web site created and wondering what valid code and good design practices can do for you, check out the CSS Zen Garden site, an excellent example that is logically structured and able to accept stylesheets of wildly different appearances without the need for markup changes.

—KB

Tags: , , , , ,
Posted in Web Design, Web Standards | 4 Comments »