<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Web Design and SEO Blog - Blizzard DigitalPosts dated  &#187; Kyle Blizzard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bliznet.com/author/kb/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bliznet.com</link>
	<description>Internet marketing and web design experience.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 19:32:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Pesky iframe and XHTML Strict</title>
		<link>http://www.bliznet.com/the-pesky-iframe-and-xhtml-strict/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bliznet.com/the-pesky-iframe-and-xhtml-strict/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 19:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Blizzard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conditional Comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iframe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Object]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XHTML]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bliznet.com/?p=736</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#8217;ve done much web work before, you&#8217;ve probably, at some time or another, had to use an iframe. It&#8217;s not pretty, but sometimes it&#8217;s the only choice, such as embedding a widget from another site or displaying things such as real estate listings. One of my biggest problems with it is that it doesn&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;ve done much web work before, you&#8217;ve probably, at some time or another, had to use an <code>iframe</code>. It&#8217;s not pretty, but sometimes it&#8217;s the only choice, such as embedding a widget from another site or displaying things such as real estate listings. One of my biggest problems with it is that it doesn&#8217;t exist in the spec for XHTML Strict! It exists in Transitional, but I don&#8217;t like to use it. That may be good enough for some developers, but certainly not for me. How about you?</p>
<p>In Internet Explorer 8 (and possibly IE7, but I have not tested it) and Firefox, you can use the <code>object</code> element to embed a web page just like an <code>iframe</code>; however, IE gives it a thick, lovely border that seems impossible to remove. Here&#8217;s the trick: employing IE&#8217;s conditional comments, use an <code>iframe</code> for IE and an <code>object</code> for everything else. Here&#8217;s an example:</p>
<pre><code>&lt;!--[if !IE]&gt;--&gt;&lt;object data="http://www.bliznet.com/" width="320" height="240" /&gt;
	&lt;!--&lt;![endif]--&gt;
&lt;!--[if IE]&gt;&lt;iframe frameborder="0" src="http://www.bliznet.com/" width="320" height="240" /&gt;
	&lt;![endif]--&gt;</code></pre>
<p>Valid XHTML Strict! Make sure to keep your settings the same across both elements to keep it consistent.</p>
<p>Happy coding!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bliznet.com/the-pesky-iframe-and-xhtml-strict/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Valid Flash Embed and Preloaders in Internet Explorer</title>
		<link>http://www.bliznet.com/valid-flash-embed-and-preloaders/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bliznet.com/valid-flash-embed-and-preloaders/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 18:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Blizzard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conditional Comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Embed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Preloader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XHTML]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bliznet.com/?p=731</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello once again, web friends. Today I bring tidings of Flash preloaders and validity. You may have noticed that with the embed code from my YouTube article that Flash movie preloaders don&#8217;t work in Internet Explorer, and the movie has to load entirely before it even displays at all. This is because Internet Explorer requires [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello once again, web friends. Today I bring tidings of Flash preloaders and validity.</p>
<p>You may have noticed that with the embed code from my <a href="/valid-flash-embed/">YouTube article</a> that Flash movie preloaders don&#8217;t work in Internet Explorer, and the movie has to load entirely before it even displays at all. This is because Internet Explorer requires a different attribute and the removal of another in the <code>object</code> tag to let preloaders work properly. However, with different attributes, the Flash movie will not display at all in Firefox, so we must use Internet Explorer&#8217;s <a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms537512(VS.85).aspx">conditional comments</a> to utilize two different opening <code>object</code> tags. Behold:</p>
<pre><code>&lt;!--[if !IE]&gt;--&gt;&lt;object data="yourmovie.swf" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"
	width="320" height="240"&gt;&lt;!--&lt;![endif]--&gt;
&lt;!--[if IE]&gt;&lt;object classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000"
	width="320" height="240"&gt;&lt;![endif]--&gt;
	&lt;param name="movie" value="yourmovie.swf" /&gt;
	&lt;param name="quality" value="high" /&gt;
&lt;/object&gt;</code></pre>
<p>The first line is the original that works in both IE and Firefox but doesn&#8217;t allow preloaders in IE. The second is the IE-only method that works with preloaders. Note the lack of a <code>data</code> attribute and the addition of a <code>classid</code> attribute.</p>
<p>Well, there you have it. Venture forth and embed Flash validly with preload animations!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bliznet.com/valid-flash-embed-and-preloaders/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Semantic Markup &#8211; Why Should You Use It?</title>
		<link>http://www.bliznet.com/semantic-markup/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bliznet.com/semantic-markup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 16:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Blizzard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Extraction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Semantic Markup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Semantics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XHTML]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bliznet.com/?p=529</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why should you use semantic markup when designing your website pages?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your markup should have meaning. Markup your content appropriately (e.g. put your address and phone number in the <code>address</code> element) and it becomes much more readable to search engines and other software used for data extraction. Using only <code>div</code> and <code>span</code> elements leaves much to be desired, semantically speaking. These elements are certainly indispensable, however, there are some cases where there are more meaningful elements to use. For example:</p>
<ul>
<li>Use <code>h1</code> as your page title; use <code>h2</code> and on appropriately as sub-headings on the page. This provides an outline of your document.</li>
<li>Use lists (<code>dl</code>, <code>ol</code>, <code>ul</code>) instead of manually placing numbers or bullets.</li>
<li>Use <code>address</code> for any contact information on your page, including physical address, email address, phone numbers, and whatever else you would consider to be contact info.</li>
<li>Use <code>table</code> on data best represented in rows and columns. Use <code>thead</code> and <code>th</code> to markup the column headings and <code>tbody</code> for the data itself.</li>
</ul>
<p>Check the <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/text.html">HTML spec</a> for additional meaningful elements and get to work! <img src='http://www.bliznet.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>You can use the W3&#8242;s handy <a href="http://www.w3.org/2003/12/semantic-extractor.html">Semantic Data Extractor</a> tool to test your new semantic web site to give you an idea of how it would be seen by software.</p>
<p>That does it for now. See you next time! Until then, read <a href="http://www.bliznet.com/seo-and-validation/">SEO and Validation</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bliznet.com/semantic-markup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Valid Flash Embed &#8211; Make That YouTube Embed Valid!</title>
		<link>http://www.bliznet.com/valid-flash-embed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bliznet.com/valid-flash-embed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 03:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Blizzard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Embed Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTML]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Markup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Validation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[W3C]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XHTML]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bliznet.com/?p=524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Find out how to make that YouTube embed valid.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hola! It&#8217;s been a while. I&#8217;ve got another gripe, and this time it&#8217;s with Flash embed code!</p>
<p>Most of the embed code I see for Flash movies is invalid, usually containing the non-existent <code>embed</code> element or some-such. Even the code provided by YouTube for embedding videos contains <code>embed</code>. This can easily be thrown out and will—probably most of the time—instantly make your code valid.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s an example (in XHTML) of a valid Flash embed that works in at least IE6+, Firefox, and Safari:</p>
<p><code>&lt;object data="flash.swf" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="320" height="240"&gt;<br />
&lt;param name="movie" value="flash.swf" /&gt;<br />
&lt;/object&gt;</code></p>
<p>That&#8217;s all there is to it. Adjust the parameters and add additional <code>param</code> elements as necessary. If your Flash movie requires variables, just add an extra <code>param</code> as follows:</p>
<p><code>&lt;param name="flashvars" value="arg1=foo&amp;amp;arg2=bar" /&gt;</code></p>
<p>If you place additional elements inside the <code>object</code> element, it will act as a fallback, displaying if the Flash plugin isn&#8217;t installed. For example:</p>
<p><code>&lt;object data="flash.swf" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="320" height="240"&gt;<br />
&lt;param name="movie" value="flash.swf" /&gt;<br />
&lt;img src="fallback.jpg" alt="Flash Didn't Load!" /&gt;<br />
&lt;/object&gt;</code></p>
<p>That&#8217;s all for now. Happy coding!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bliznet.com/valid-flash-embed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CSS Float Trick</title>
		<link>http://www.bliznet.com/css-float-trick/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bliznet.com/css-float-trick/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 19:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Blizzard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XHTML]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bliznet.com/?p=260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How to make a list of items appear side by side without and empty div.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you ever have a list of items (such as a <code>ul</code>) in which each item is floating to make them appear side-by-side (an example is the list of sites at <a href="http://www.blizzarddigital.org/">BlizzardDigital.org</a>)? Tired of using a <a href="http://www.bliznet.com/semantic-markup/">non-semantic</a>, empty div after the <code>ul</code> to clear the items? A useful trick is to add <code>float: left;</code> to the <code>ul</code> itself. This fits the <code>ul</code>&#8216;s box around its inner items. Without <code>float</code> specified, the <code>ul</code>&#8216;s box does not wrap around its items at all, making everything on the page after it scoot up behind all the list items. Very annoying. The normal fix for this would be to make the following element clear, but this isn&#8217;t always desirable. Your options are probably to have an empty div after it specifically to clear it (yuck) or make the probably unrelated following element clear it (yuck also). Just float the containing element (in my example, a <code>ul</code>) and set its width to 100%. The width makes sure no one squeezes in on the sides and therefore no clearing is necessary.</p>
<p><em>Clear</em> as mud, right? <img src='http://www.bliznet.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bliznet.com/css-float-trick/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Random Web Design Tips</title>
		<link>http://www.bliznet.com/more-random-web-design-tips/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bliznet.com/more-random-web-design-tips/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 19:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Blizzard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XHTML]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bliznet.com/?p=167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How to write page-specific CSS as necessary without creating an extra stylesheet.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Body Element Classes</h3>
<p>One thing I&#8217;ve started doing somewhat recently is adding a unique class name to the <code>body</code> element of each page. This allows me to write page-specific CSS as necessary without creating an extra stylesheet. Ideally, there should be styles for common elements that make up the site, rather than style for each page, but this can&#8217;t always be avoided. One case could be that a particular page needs to have a slightly different layout than the rest of the site. <code>Body</code> element class to the rescue!</p>
<h3>Internet Explorer 6</h3>
<p>We all know Internet Explorer 6 is a regular pain in the neck, right? Fortunately, it&#8217;s easy to add IE6-specific style with this selector:<br />
<code>* html [additional selectors...]</code></p>
<p>For example, the style <code>* html p { font-weight: bold; }</code> makes all paragraphs bold <em>only in Internet Explorer 6</em>.  It&#8217;s valid, but no other major browser will apply it. This is useful because sometimes the style needed to make things in IE6 look one way is <em>drastically</em> different than what is needed to make it look the same in all the other browsers. A simpler solution, though, is to tell your client to upgrade his 8-year-old browser. <img src='http://www.bliznet.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<h3>&#8220;Navbars&#8221;</h3>
<p>A site typically has a &#8220;bar&#8221; of navigational links. Vertically laid out navigation is easy to create and append additional links later. Horizontal navigation is sometimes desired instead, but it&#8217;s not always as trivial to append and can be a little trickier to achieve.</p>
<p>This tip will be focused on horizontal navigation. First, you should most definitely use unordered lists (the <code>ul</code> element) to organize your navigation links whether you&#8217;re using vertical, horizontal, upside-down, or anything-else-you-can-think of navigation. (See the W3&#8242;s excellent <a onclick="return OpenOffSite(this)" href="http://www.w3.org/QA/Tips/unordered-lists">webmaster tips</a> for more on unordered lists and their uses.) Once you&#8217;ve marked up your navigational links, jump over to the stylesheet and add a <code>display: inline;</code> line to your navigation&#8217;s <code>li</code> elements. Now take a step back and behold your now-horizontal navigational links!</p>
<p>If you find you need to set the width and height of your links, just set the display type of the <code>a</code> elements to <code>inline-block</code>, which I was surprised to find out was actually supported in Internet Explorer 6! Once you&#8217;ve set that, your links will behave like block-level elements as far as styling goes, but they will remain positioned inline. <em>Sweet!</em></p>
<p>Well, that&#8217;s all for now. Make sure to check back occasionally for more random web tips from your Uncle Kyle!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bliznet.com/more-random-web-design-tips/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The img Element Vs the CSS background-image Property</title>
		<link>http://www.bliznet.com/img-vs-background-image/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bliznet.com/img-vs-background-image/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 22:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Blizzard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XHTML]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bliznet.com/?p=136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Find out when to use the img element or when to use the CSS background-image property.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t know when to use the <em>img</em> element or when to use the CSS <em>background-image</em> property? Don&#8217;t fret; there is hope. Read further and all shall be revealed.</p>
<p>The <em>img</em> element is best used for pictures that are completely unrelated to the stylesheet. That is, pictures that would need to display no matter how much the look of the site changes. These would be pictures related to a news article or photos in a gallery.</p>
<p>The CSS <em>background-image</em> property is for images that make up the appearance of the stylesheet. These pictures on one stylesheet would be different or just completely absent on another stylesheet. They don&#8217;t add to the content of the page in any way and are only there to give the page its &#8220;look&#8221;. These image files would be stored in the stylesheet&#8217;s <em>images</em> folder. (See my <a title="Organizing Your CSS Files" href="/organizing-your-css-files/">last post</a> for more on this.)</p>
<p>Just another tip from your uncle Kyle!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bliznet.com/img-vs-background-image/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Organizing Your CSS Files</title>
		<link>http://www.bliznet.com/organizing-your-css-files/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bliznet.com/organizing-your-css-files/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 20:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Blizzard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bliznet.com/?p=133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How to keep your styles consolidated and make it easy to use them across multiple websites.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I create a web site, I like to organize my stylesheets and images into a specific folder structure. It keeps things tidy and separates presentation files (stylesheets and images) from content files (pages and images related to the content). It also leaves room for additional stylesheet &#8220;themes&#8221; for your site.</p>
<p>Here is an example of this folder structure:</p>
<p><em>/styles/<br />
/styles/default/<br />
/styles/default/images/</em></p>
<p><em>Default</em> in this example would be the name of the &#8220;theme&#8221;. The sites I develop typically do not have multiple themes for the user to pick, so I don&#8217;t usually take the time to give them fancy names. However, if your site utilizes multiple stylesheets that the user could choose from (such as at the <a onclick="return OpenOffSite(this)" href="http://www.csszengarden.com/">CSS Zen Garden</a>), creative names would be helpful.</p>
<p>All stylesheets for the <em>Default</em> theme would be placed in the <em>/styles/default/</em> folder. Likewise, images used by those stylesheets would go in the <em>/styles/default/images/</em> folder.</p>
<p>This method keeps your styles consolidated and makes it easy to use them across multiple sites. All you need to do is copy the folder to the other site; you don&#8217;t need to pick through the <em>images</em> folder and figure out which ones are used by the stylesheet and which ones aren&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Technically, you wouldn&#8217;t even need to copy anything to another site. You could just specify the full URL in the <em>link</em> element or <em>@import</em> rule on the page, but I urge you not to do this. Your visitors may be using security software that sees cross-site references as malicious, thus blocking the stylesheet from downloading or, worse, blocking the entire page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bliznet.com/organizing-your-css-files/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
